Codes of Conduct & Ethics

Codes of Conduct play an important role in CISs, especially at the level of design and use. The codes which are relevant here might be divided into two types: (1) those which are directed at ICT professionals and (2) those which are directed at PPDR and DRM practitioners. Such codes can support and/or be in conflict with more general governing mechanisms for ICT, which often do not include guidance for the individual professional. Good governance of ICT needs to include ethical principles regarding the everyday practice of practitioners engaging with CISs and rules of conduct for when conflicts arise.


Guiding Questions

Will you implement a Code of Conduct?
How will participants in the CIS be aware of it?
How will it be decided which codes of conduct and ethical principles will inform the collaboration?

Further Information

Codes of Conduct aim at encouraging professional and ethical conduct, with the latter usually defined broadly as contributing to the common good of humanity. Such codes embody shared commitments and agreed upon rules helping to create a community, a necessary practice when managing diverse users. They also help sensitise users to new ethical, legal and social challenges, and offer guidance when confronted with different decisions. They can help build wider societal trust in those managing, governing, and using a CIS. They can also work to deflect greater external regulation.
While such codes exist, studies have suggested that many of those engaging with the design and use of information and communication technology are not aware of them and often do not see the issues that might arise in wider society as relevant to the decisions they are making at present.
Codes of conduct for engagement with volunteers online and in situ are seen as important, given the intensive social innovation in this area. Some exist and are listed under ‘Resources’.

Examples

UK Police Code of Ethics: The UK police have a Code of Ethics which all officers must abide by. Principle 7 is Confidentiality, which explains that police officers must ‘treat information with respect, and access or disclose it only in the proper course’ of their duties. The Code includes some guidelines regarding the use of social media. However, there are no other guidelines regarding engaging with CISs. If a member of the public feels that the police have breached this code, they can make a complaint via the police website and/or the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC). The IPCC collects complaints and makes that data publicly available. This data is also used in reviews of police performance and how to improve the police forces.

ICRC 2013 Professional standards for Protection Work: The ICRC was one of the first to establish a code of conduct that includes discussion of sensitive data. It focuses on protetcion work carried out by humanitarian and human rights actors in armed conflict and other situations of violence, but includes more generally useful guidance on what to be aware of and how to manage sensitive data, including chapters on Collecting information from afar: understanding the risks and advantages linked to new technologies and methodologies, Respecting the basic principles, Ensuring relevance and quality, Preparing interviews and ensuring informed consent and privacy, Cooperation and exchange.

Social Media Data: People affected by risks and disaster, volunteers, volunteer organisations and others are increasingly turning to social media. They generate and seek information. Codes of conduct to address the challenges and opportunities arising at this juncture are emerging. One of the first is this article with a brief overview of the emerging legal and ethical issues within crisis mapping.

 

Resources

Büscher, M., Liegl, M., Wahlgren, P. (2013). Ethical, Legal and Social Issues: Current practices in Multi Agency Emergency Collaboration. BRIDGE Project Deliverable 12.2 [Link] (Contains reviews of some codes of conduct, as well as discussion of the concept of codes of conduct)
Crawford, K., Faleiros, G., Luers, A., Meier, P., Perlich, C., and Thorp, J. (2013). Big Data, Communities and Ethical Resilience: A Framework for Action. The Rockefeller Foundation [Link
Gotterbarn, D. (2009) ICT Governance and What to do about the Toothless Tiger(s): Professional Organizations and Codes of Ethics. Australasian Journal of Information Systems. 16: 165-184. [Link]
International Committee of the Red Cross. (2013). Professional standards for Protection Work. [Link
Petersen, K. and Büscher, M. (Eds) (2017). ELSI Guidance for 21st Century Networked Crisis Management. SecInCoRe Project Deliverable 2.7 [Link
Prasad, A., Green, P. and Heales, J. (2013). On Governing Collaborative Information Technology (IT): A Relational Perspective. Journal of Information Systems. 27(1): 237-259. [DOI]
Pye, G. and Warren, M. J. (2006). Striking a Balance between Ethics and ICT Governance. Australasian Journal of Information Systems. 13: 201-207.
Shanley, L., Burns, R., Bastian, Z., and Robson, E. (2013). Tweeting up a Storm. The Promise and Perils of Crisis Mapping. [Link
Transparency International Ethics [Link]
UK College of Policing [Link]
UK Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) [Link